Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05718
Original file (BC 2013 05718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05718
					COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His record be corrected to reflect award of the following 
decorations and medals:

      The Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA).  
(Administratively corrected)

      The Air Force Organizational Excellence Award.

      The Air Defense Weapon Center Award.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He earned the awards while he was assigned to the 2021st 
Communications Squadron (CS); however, he did not receive them and 
they are not listed on his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from 
Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 13 Sep 77 separation.

His untimely application should be waived in the interest of 
justice because he just recently became aware that these awards 
were in effect.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 14 Sep 73, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force, for 
a period of four years.  

The applicant’s DD Form 214 included award of the NDSM and the Air 
Force Longevity Service Award (AFLSA).


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request to be 
awarded the Air Force Organizational Excellence Award and the Air 
Defense Weapon Center Award.  There is no official documentation 
the applicant was directly assigned to the Air Defense Weapons 
Center.  

The applicant was assigned to the 2021 CS between 14 Sep 73 and 
13 Sep 77.  

The 2021 CS was awarded the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award for 
the following award inclusive periods: 1 Jan 75 to 31 Dec 75, 
1 Jan 76 to 31 Dec 76, and 1 Jan 77 to 31 Dec 77.  After a 
thorough review of the applicant's official military personnel 
records.

The Air Force Weapons Center received award of the Air Force 
Organizational Excellence Award for the inclusive period of 1 Jun 
73 to 30 Jun 75.  However, they were unable to locate official 
documentation to verify the applicant was assigned to the Air 
Defense Weapons Center during the inclusive period of their award 
of the Air Force Organizational Excellence Award. 

Although the Air Defense Weapons Center was awarded the Air Force 
Organizational Excellence Award during the applicant's assignment 
to a subordinate unit, the 2021 CS, the Air Force Organizational 
Excellence Award is not shared by numbered subordinate units 
without an exception to policy request.  DPSID were unable to 
locate an exception to policy request verifying the applicant's 
direct unit of assignment shared in award of the Air Force 
Organizational Excellence Award awarded to the Air Force Weapons 
Center; therefore, rendering the applicant ineligible.

DPSID was unable to verify award of the Air Defense Weapons Center 
Award as it is not an official award of the Department of Defense 
or the United States Air Force.  To grant relief would be contrary 
to the criteria established by DoDM 1348.33, the Secretary of the 
Air Force, Chief of Staff, and/or the War Department.

The applicant’s record will be administratively corrected to 
reflect award of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with two 
Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters (AFOUA w/2BOLC).  

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 25 Apr 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.   After careful consideration of applicant’s request and the 
available evidence of record, we find the application untimely.  
The applicant did not file within three years after the alleged 
error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United 
States Code, Section 1552 and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, Air 
Force Board for Correction of Military Records.  The applicant has 
not shown a sufficient reason for the delay in filing on a matter 
now dating back over 37 years.  Additionally, we are not persuaded 
the record raises issues of error or injustice which requires 
resolution on the merits.  Therefore, other than the relief that 
has been already granted administratively, we cannot conclude it 
would be in the interest of justice to excuse the untimely filing 
of this application. 


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the 
interest of justice to waive the untimeliness.  It is the decision 
of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as untimely.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2013-05718 in Executive Session on 21 Oct 14 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 Dec 13, w/atch.
	Exhibit B.  Pertinent Excerpts from Personnel Record.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 24 Mar 14.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Apr 14.



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05290

    Original file (BC 2013 05290.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05290 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 21 Aug 75 discharge, be corrected to add the awards below in Item 26, Decoration, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citation, and Campaign Ribbons...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04002

    Original file (BC-2011-04002.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Entitlement verified – will be administratively corrected) _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The applicant asserts that other members of his units received the AFOUA w/V &1OLC and the RVNGC w/P and two Bronze Service Stars, while serving in Vietnam. A letter from the Air Force Historical Research Agency (AFHRA) to a member of his unit clearly states the AFOUA w/2 V’s is authorized because “all” detachments to this unit share...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00108

    Original file (BC 2014 00108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00108 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect: 1. His DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect this period of time deployed to Thailand, as well as award of the AFOUA, the VSM w/P and the RVNGC w/V. No action required by the Board, as the applicant’s official...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01527

    Original file (BC 2014 01527.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01527 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be updated to reflect award of two (2) Bronze Service Stars (BSSs) for his previously awarded Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application because he did not realize the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03108

    Original file (BC 2014 03108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on his dates in Vietnam, DPSID was able to verify he is authorized two Bronze Service Stars (BSS) to the VSM for his participation in the Vietnam Defensive Campaign and Vietnam Air Campaign. Campaign streamers are embroidered swallow-tailed ribbons of the same design as campaign or service medals awarded to members for service in a named campaign. Based on review of the applicant’s official military personnel record, DPSID was able to determine that the below Air Force Medals and/or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02044

    Original file (BC 2014 02044.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02044 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following: 1. He was awarded the Cold War Medal and other awards/decorations not recorded on the DD Form 214. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01859

    Original file (BC 2014 01859.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01859 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his earned awards while attached to the 340th Bomb Wing and 51st Fighter Wing. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05816

    Original file (BC 2013 05816.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05816 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official personnel records [referred to as “St Louis Records” by the applicant] and DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to address the following errors: 1. Credit for foreign Service time in Vietnam should be two (2) months and three (3) days. After a review of the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01981

    Original file (BC-2013-01981.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01981 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant’s dates of service in Thailand (Dec 74 to Nov 75) are after the inclusive dates for award of the VSM; therefore, he is ineligible for the award of the VSM. After thoroughly reviewing the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03506

    Original file (BC-2012-03506.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request for Foreign Service time in the Republic of Vietnam. There is insufficient evidence to verify award of the SAEMR. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the...